If you can't get a national manufacturing policy going, you can at least get a grassroots one going.
Full disclosure: I am a member of the EDRP wing of IEDC that gave input on this report so I do have a bias.
The report's purpose is to arm economic development professionals with some talking points and case studies for manufacturing growth. It does that and more.
The bottom line message is this: You won't see the phrase "national manufacturing policy" one time in this national report from a national group. This report is really a grassroots reference guide to getting manufacturing going in the U.S. one community at a time.
Even beyond the bottom line, there's a lot to like in this report. If you're like me, you'll like these tidbits:
Page 26: Under "Key U.S. Advantages" header is a list of reasons the U.S. future for manufacturing is so great.
Page 27: The report mentions Joel Kotkin and cites demographics as a reason behind manufacturing strengths in the U.S.
Page 35: The map on rail capacity in 2035 in the U.S. is a huge wake-up call for why infrastructure investment is so critical in a national manufacturing policy.
Page 66: C-TEC's 79|Seventy Manufacturing Certification Program gets mention in an inset box under the Workforce Development header.
Page 140: C-TEC's program gets a full case study-level recognition. Now, it truly can call itself a national-model program.
Page 170: Though I'm a skeptic, there is a list of Federal resources to help economic development agencies go after helping their local manufacturers.
No comments:
Post a Comment